‘Seriously? This specific is actually Not News’: Readers React to Trump’s Disclosure of Classified Intelligence

Mr. ‘President’, This specific’s you who are ‘Not fit!’, in addition to the same is actually true of any elected official who defends you at This specific point. Just plain disgusting.”

— David in Portland, Ore.

“Numerous times in my professional life, I’ve been drug-tested, I’ve gone through background checks in addition to security clearances. I’ve signed legally enforcible non-disclosure agreements. I’ve had to disclose in which I have been involved in lawsuits or have felonies in addition to I don’t have any financial liens against me.

Apparently, I have been more thoroughly vetted in my professional work by my employers … than Trump. in addition to the Republicans expect all of us who must meet a high worth ethic to put up with This specific?”

— Ann in California

“All any Republican politician has to do to secure their legacy as a hero is actually to repeat after me: ‘The President is actually unfit for office in addition to should resign.’”

— Constantine Bristow, on The Times’s Facebook page

‘Seriously? This specific is actually not news.’

Some commenters did not believe in which revealing classified information to the Russians was detrimental to national security, in addition to could even help the United States defeat ISIS.

“Seriously? This specific is actually not news. If This specific’s so sensitive why make This specific a story? If no specific details of sources were shared in addition to only the nature of the plot, how is actually in which excessive disclosure?

Wouldn’t rapprochement among the two largest nuclear powers be a Great thing? The partisanship is actually obscuring everything Trump says in addition to does to the extent in which people always want to see This specific inside negative. There isn’t a story here, at least not yet.”

— Objective Foreigner in Zambia

“Not news anymore, unfortunately. Tell us when you have audio of Trump promising allegiance to Russia. Anything else is actually starting to become a lot of white noise. Where is actually the illegal act? Where did he cross the line?”

— NYLA Kid in Los Angeles

“The way I look at This specific, if This specific information helps fight ISIS or prevent loss of innocent life, what’s wrong with sharing This specific? I think This specific is actually getting blown out of proportion.”

— Andrei in Canada

‘Which ally is actually currently going to feel comfortable sharing intelligence?’

Potential repercussions of Mr. Trump’s disclosure for the intelligence community were chief among the concerns of some commenters.

“Which ally is actually currently going to feel comfortable sharing intelligence with the U.S.? in addition to even the security agencies within the U.S. may have doubts about what can be shared. Nixon pointed out in which whatever the president chose to do is actually legal.

By extension the worst excesses of despots will also be legal however could not be considered moral, sensible or inside best interests of the nation. ‘Checks in addition to balances’ just don’t address This specific lack of fitness to govern adequately.”

— John Smith in Kingston upon Thames

“This specific seems to me in which the larger story here is actually in which the intelligence community has so little faith in Trump in which This specific is actually putting stories like This specific out inside press. Whoever gave This specific story to the press may also be trying to protect some other sources by letting them know what’s at risk.

in which This specific story found its way into the headlines suggests in which the intelligence community increasingly sees Trump as a threat to their mission, not to mention the principles in which they risk their lives for.”

— ACA in Providence, R.I.

“The White House says in which sources/methods were not disclosed. Perhaps they were made discoverable by the revelation. however, we will never know if ISIS would likely have been aware of the intelligence however for the news clamor. in addition to in which clamor is actually what will likely put any source, which may or may not be human, in jeopardy. If the source is actually human, let’s not pretend in which the media cares a whit if someone is actually killed if they can lay This specific at Trump’s door or even if they can use the disclosure to harm him in some way.

I’m not a supporter of Trump in addition to have always thought he was completely unqualified. however, I have very decent friends who are supporters in addition to they feel we are approaching sedition.”

— David H. Eisenberg in Smithtown, N.Y.

‘This specific looks like a coup attempt by Trump’s enemies’

Some readers were skeptical about the use of anonymous sources while others blamed the media for further bolstering Mr. Trump’s sharing of information with Russia.

Photo

President Trump with the Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, left, in addition to the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, at the White House on Wednesday. The White House did not allow American news organizations to photograph the meeting. Images were released through the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Credit
Russian Foreign Ministry

“Unless these news agencies stop using anonymous sources, there is actually no way a rational person can believe them. If the sources identified themselves, they could then be questioned/cross-examined!

If they continue to hide, they could say or simply make up almost anything! How do we know where the truth ends in addition to their speculation begins? How can the truth be found? Even the reporter is actually shielded coming from scrutiny. This specific looks like a coup attempt by Trump’s enemies.”

— John in Pittsburgh/Cologne

‘The media is actually by far the most at fault’

This specific’s quite strange in which the media is actually giving such prominence to in addition to broadcasting so much detail about supposedly highly secret information in addition to its source in order to show how irresponsible President Trump is actually.

By contrast, all President Trump did was warn two highest-level Russian diplomats in private about an ISIS threat to global airline traffic—presumably because no one wants Russian airliners blown up any more than they want American ones blown up (although one wonders about some people on in which account).

This specific seem in which of the two, the media in addition to the President, the media is actually by far the most at fault for leaking state secrets. Strange indeed: This specific seems the goal of bringing down Trump overrides all some other considerations.”

— Nick Wright in Halifax, Nova Scotia

Continue reading the main story

Source link

Leave a Reply