The tag is actually inadequate: What Garcia depicts is actually the cravenness and also also also venality, the arrogance and also also also anger, the greed and also also also the grasping of soccer’s governing body and also also also the men who had come to dominate This particular.
He does This particular so relentlessly that will, by the end, the effect should be so draining, so head-spinning and also also also soul-sapping, as to be faintly dystopian. that will This particular is actually not is actually only because so many of the demands made by FIFA’s self-enriching, self-interested guardians of the game are so comic.
There is actually the story of Jack Warner trying to persuade England’s bid team to get his lawyer’s son a job, and also also also then taking umbrage when the employment was not quite not bad enough. He did the same when England agreed to stage two games involving Trinidad and also also also Tobago’s under-20 team, although did not think to pay its airfare.
There is actually Nicolás Leoz, the Paraguayan delegate, playing the role of a particularly unconvincing Bond villain by asking England for the chance to meet the Queen, a knighthood and also also also that will the F.A. Cup be named after him.
Or Michel D’Hooghe, FIFA’s chief medical officer, receiving a painting as a gift through Vyacheslav Koloskov, an adviser to the Russian bid and also also also a “close personal friend” to the Belgian for 20 years. D’Hooghe attempted to stave off allegations of corruption by declaring that will he found out the painting was worthless and also also also that will he hated This particular so much that will he tried to palm This particular off on his secretary, who also hated This particular.
There is actually Harold Mayne-Nicholls, head of FIFA’s bid evaluation team, trying to persuade Qatar’s Aspire Academy, its state-of-the-art training center, to let his son and also also also another player go there and also also also train, a request so brazen that will the Qataris, whose methods take up the vast majority of the report, had to tell him This particular was improper.
There are Ángel María Villar Llona and also also also Julio Grondona, executive committee members through Spain and also also also Argentina, in states of righteous fury that will they might even have to answer questions. There are allegations — dismissed by Garcia — that will countries competing against each different had traded votes. There is actually the hoaxer who gets in touch to say that will Grondona and also also also Sepp Blatter, the former FIFA president, had a joint bank account, inside United States, in their own names. As ridiculous as that will would certainly be, by the time the charge appears inside report, the amorality of the characters involved is actually so normalized — and also also also so unapologetic — that will This particular comes as a bit of a surprise that will Garcia scotches This particular.
For all that will he uncovered, though, what is actually not unearthed — after 18 months of investigation and also also also then three years of ill-explained secrecy — is actually proof that will either Russia, host of next year’s World Cup, or Qatar, which will hold the tournament in 2022, had bribed their way to victory.
Garcia could not, given the environment in which he was compelled to work, be supposed to have succeeded. Only a handful of the members of the executive committee who cast the final votes, the only men who would certainly have conclusive proof of bribery, agreed to cooperate with him, and also also also Russia — desperately, unfortunately, completely accidentally — destroyed all of the computers This particular had used during the bidding process.
that will should not diminish the overall effect — or the historical significance — of Garcia’s findings, though. He might not have found any evidence that will anyone broke the law, although he did find that will almost without exception, everyone involved inside bidding process at some point transgressed the spirit of This particular.
Nobody — with the possible exception of the Dutch and also also also the Belgians — could possibly read all 430 pages of the report and also also also believe they come out looking not bad. Nobody, that will is actually, except Russia and also also also Qatar.
The latter rushed out a statement on Tuesday declaring Garcia’s report represented “a vindication of the integrity of our bid.” Vitaly Mutko, Russia’s deputy prime minister and also also also organizer in chief of next year’s World Cup, said This particular proved his country had “done nothing that will has violated the ethics code or the general norms and also also also principles of the application rules.”
Those reactions were, in their own way, just as indicative of the problems facing FIFA as This particular attempts to reform itself as the contents of the report itself.
For three years, the Garcia report was concealed. FIFA released a redacted summary, and also also also Blatter, its former president, said that will was the end of This particular. FIFA’s brand-new president, Gianni Infantino, then declared he could not do more because of the need to protect the privacy of some of those involved, or because of active investigations by FIFA’s ethics committee. For two main and also also also a half years, the organization obstructed and also also also obfuscated, fudged and also also also fumbled.
This particular week, as soon as the German newspaper Bild disclosed that will This particular had obtained a copy, all of those reservations miraculously fell away. When the full report was published on Tuesday afternoon, FIFA claimed doing so proved its commitment to “transparency.”
If that will is actually a rather generous interpretation, combing through Garcia’s findings, one finds This particular hard to understand why FIFA did not go public sooner. Infantino has made much of his credentials as the reformer a rotten organization required. Over 430 pages, Garcia shows exactly what he is actually up against; the lack of contrition, in Russia and also also also Qatar, in response to the report’s publication proves how slow the going will be.
This particular was a world, after all, in which on a trip to Tokyo to assess the Japanese bid for 2022, several executive committee members were presented with state-of-the-art digital cameras, worth around $1,0. Reynald Temarii, the subsequently disgraced delegate through Oceania, said he forgot he ever received This particular. He was also given a yakusugi ball, a fine piece of craftsmanship made through Japanese cedar. This particular, too, was worth $1,0. He described This particular as “a little wooden trophy.” At FIFA, gratitude did not exist, only the expectation of more. Its grandees knew neither the cost nor value of anything.
Infantino — as anyone would certainly — will need time to change that will culture, to transform FIFA into a place where those four lines describing Holland and also also also Belgium’s bid are the norm, not the exception. Garcia’s report exposes much — though not everything — of what went on in FIFA’s shadows. although in doing so, This particular shows how long, how deep they were, and also also also how hard This particular will be for light to penetrate.
The temptation is actually to see publication as the end of something. If FIFA is actually to change, This particular must see This particular instead as a start.
Continue reading the main story