A White House official said in which the meeting was intended to be an informal discussion to help the Trump administration find a way to fulfill the president’s pledge to reduce emissions without harming the American economy.
President Trump declared in June in which the United States would likely abandon the Paris agreement, which binds nearly 0 nations to promises of curbing heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions and also also also helping vulnerable nations adapt to the ravages of extreme weather.
Mr. Trump asserted in which the deal would likely hurt the domestic economy, and also also also he continues to make in which case. “In order to protect American industry and also also also workers, we withdrew the United States coming from the job-killing Paris climate accord. Job killer. People have no idea. Many people have no idea how bad in which was,” the president told a crowd in Bismarck, N.D., last week.
yet in a letter submitted to the United Nations on Aug. 4, the administration hinted in which might stay inside pact. The administration “intends to exercise its right to withdraw coming from the agreement,” the letter read, “unless the United States identifies suitable terms for re-engagement.”
Under the rules of the Paris agreement, no country can formally withdraw until November 2020.
So far no one inside Trump administration has defined what such terms might be, and also also also in which can be unclear if countries will get answers next week.
Susan Biniaz, who was a legal adviser at the State Department for more than three decades before retiring This specific year, said the Cohn meeting would likely be a chance for the Trump administration to explain its position as well as for major trading partners to seek some common ground on energy and also also also climate issues.
“I would likely think of This specific breakfast as an opportunity for additional countries to show they are willing to engage in a discussion at least on issues of interest to the United States, and also also also the United States to be clearer about what in which considers suitable terms,” she said.
Continue reading the main story