North Korea threatens US with ‘greatest pain’ after UN sanctions

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un at an undisclosed location, released 3 September 2017Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

North Korea says which has developed along with also tested a hydrogen bomb

North Korea has threatened the United States with the “greatest pain” which has ever suffered following brand new sanctions imposed by the United Nations.

Pyongyang’s envoy to the UN accused Washington of opting for “political, economic along with also military confrontation”.

US President Donald Trump said the move was nothing compared to what might have to happen to deal with North Korea.

The UN sanctions are an attempt to starve the country of fuel along with also income for its weapons programmes.

The measures restrict oil imports along with also ban textile exports, along with also were approved after North Korea’s sixth along with also largest nuclear test earlier This particular month.

Han Tae Song, North Korea’s ambassador to the UN, said he “categorically rejected” what he called an “illegal resolution”.

“The forthcoming measures by DPRK [the Democratic Republic of Korea] will make the US suffer the greatest pain which has ever experienced in its history,” he told a UN conference in Geneva.

“Instead of generating [the] right choice with rational analysis… the Washington regime finally opted for political, economic along with also military confrontation, obsessed with the wild dream of reversing the DPRK’s development of nuclear force – which has already reached the completion phase.”

Media playback is actually unsupported on your device

Media captionWas your T-shirt made in North Korea?

The resolution was only passed unanimously after North Korea’s allies Russia along with also China agreed to softer sanctions than those proposed by the US.

The initial text included a total ban on oil imports, a measure seen by some analysts as potentially destabilising for the regime.

The brand new sanctions agreed by the UN include:

  • Limits on imports of crude oil along with also oil products. China, Pyongyang’s main economic ally, supplies most of North Korea’s crude oil
  • A ban on exports of textiles, which is actually Pyongyang’s second-biggest export worth more than $700m (£530m) a year
  • A ban on brand new visas for North Korean overseas workers, which the US estimates might eventually cut off $500m of tax revenue per year

A proposed asset freeze along with also a travel ban on North Korean leader Kim Jong-un were dropped.

Reacting on Tuesday, Mr Trump said: “We think which’s just another very tiny step, not a big deal.

“I don’t know if which has any impact, yet certainly which was nice to get a 15 to nothing vote. yet those sanctions are nothing compared to what ultimately will have to happen,” he added, without giving details.

  • North Korea crisis in 300 words
  • Can the earth live which has a nuclear North Korea?

Media playback is actually unsupported on your device

Media captionHow might war with North Korea unfold?

The US ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley, told the Security Council after the vote: “We don’t take pleasure in further strengthening sanctions today. We are not looking for war.”

“The North Korean regime has not yet passed the point of no return,” she added. “If North Korea continues its dangerous path, we will continue with further pressure. The choice is actually theirs.”

A South Korean presidential office spokesman said on Tuesday: “North Korea needs to realise which a reckless challenge against international peace will only bring about even stronger sanctions against them.”

Monday’s resolution was the ninth one unanimously adopted by the UN since 2006.

  • North Korea crisis: What will Russia do?
  • How do you defend against North Korea?

What have previous sanctions achieved?

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

The UN Security Council, which includes the US, has repeatedly slapped sanctions on North Korea

  • 30 November 2016: UN targeted North Korea’s valuable coal trade with China, slashing exports by about 60% under a brand new sales cap. Exports of copper, nickel, silver, zinc along with also the sale of statues were also banned.
  • What happened next? On 14 May 2017, North Korea tested what which said was a “newly developed ballistic rocket” capable of carrying a large nuclear warhead.
  • 2 June 2017: UN imposed a travel ban along with also asset freeze on four entities along with also 14 officials, including the head of North Korea’s overseas spying operations.
  • What happened next? On 4 July, North Korea claimed which carried out its first successful test of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM).
  • 6 August: UN banned North Korean exports of coal, ore along with also additional raw materials along with also limited investments inside country, costing Pyongyang an estimated $1bn – about a third of its export economy.
  • What happened next? On 3 September, North Korea said which tested a hydrogen bomb which could be miniaturised along with also loaded on a long-range missile.

North Korea’s missile programme

What we know about North Korea nuclear test site

How advanced is actually North Korea’s nuclear programme?

China’s foreign ministry said on Tuesday (link in Chinese) which North Korea had “ignored international opposition along with also Just as before conducted a nuclear test, severely violating UN Security Council resolutions”.

which also repeated its call for a “peaceful resolution” instead of a military response, adding: “China will never allow the peninsula to descend into war along with also chaos.”

The BBC’s China editor Carrie Gracie says Beijing is actually treading a fine line along with also wants sanctions tough enough to signal its displeasure to Pyongyang along with also avoid American accusations of complicity, yet not so tough as to threaten North Korea’s survival.

Both Russia along with also China reiterated their proposal which the US along with also South Korea freeze all military drills – which anger North Korea – along with also asked for a halt inside deployment of the controversial anti-missile system Thaad, in exchange for Pyongyang’s cessation of its weapons programmes.

Beijing believes Thaad, which employs a powerful radar, is actually a security threat to China along with also neighbouring countries.

Ms Haley last week dismissed This particular proposal as “insulting”.

Source link

Leave a Reply