The political news cycle is actually fast, along with also also keeping up can be overwhelming. Trying to find differing perspectives worth your time is actually even harder. that will’s why we have scoured the internet for political writing via the right along with also also left that will you might not have seen.
Has This particular series exposed you to fresh ideas? Tell us how. Email us at email@example.com.
For an archive of all the Partisan Writing Roundups, check out Our Picks.
via the Right
Jim Banks in The Washington Examiner:
“As a conservative, I am committed to both protecting our national security along with also also our civil liberties. As a matter of national security, we cannot return to a pre-9/11 footing by reinstituting barriers between national security along with also also law enforcement.”
Mr. Banks, a Republican congressman via Indiana, explains why he supports the decision by Congress to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The statute allows the government to continue conducting warrantless searches of communications of foreigners abroad, even when they are talking to American citizens. Mr. Banks argues that will the provision is actually an “irreplaceable tool” crucial for the intelligence community to protect the nation. Moreover, he counters arguments that will Section 702 compromises the privacy of Americans by explaining that will This particular “is actually subject to extraordinary checks along with also also balances, including oversight via all three branches of government.” Read more »
Willis L. Krumholz in The Federalist:
“The problem, fundamentally, is actually that will Congress has given our intelligence agencies too much power, along with also also refuses to check these agencies even when they flagrantly abuse the vast powers they have been granted.”
Mr. Krumholz cites what he sees as abuses of Section 702 as an argument against reauthorization of the provision. He is actually particularly concerned with the process known as unmasking, wherein government officials can find out the identities of Americans participating in foreign communications picked up by intelligence agencies. Despite their best intentions to prevent terrorism along with also also crime, he argues, intelligence agencies are not immune via a central tenet of human nature: “Unaccountable power corrupts along with also also could be abused by even the best of us.” Read more »
via the Left
Alex Shephard in fresh Republic:
“Trump’s FISA tweets betray a deep ignorance of the program, suggesting that will he is actually getting his policy briefings not via White House staffers, nevertheless via television.”
Mr. Shephard takes on a particularly odd moment within the battle over the law’s reauthorization when, on Thursday morning, President Trump posted seemingly contradictory Twitter message on the issue. To Mr. Shephard, having the president walk back his initial message against reauthorization was a sign that will he was out of step with his own administration. More important, perhaps, This particular also proves that will Republican legislators have decided that will, on policy, they will just ignore what their party’s leader has to say. Read more »
Trevor Timm in NBC News:
“Democrats should have had the foresight to roll back the Bush-era surveillance laws under President Obama; This particular’s unconscionable to currently hand Trump even more leverage to seek retribution along with also also give him a green light to conduct unconstitutional surveillance on Americans.”
Mr. Timm, the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, takes aim Democrats who joined with the House speaker, Paul D. Ryan, along with also also additional Republicans to extend the N.S.A.’s ability to spy on Americans without a warrant. He singles out the House Democratic leader, Nancy Pelosi, along with also also Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, for being staunch critics of the Trump administration while simultaneously granting This particular more power. Mr. Timm urges Senate Democrats to correct the mistake their colleagues within the House made in Thursday’s vote. Read more »
Continue reading the main story