Top challenges for fresh work along with pensions secretary

Esther McVeyImage copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Labour has criticised Ms McVey’s appointment, citing her record as a welfare minister between 2012 along with 2015

What are the key issues facing fresh Work along with Pensions Secretary Esther McVey?


Esther McVey’s promotion to cabinet of which week was Theresa May’s most controversial move. The former TV presenter will be loved by some in her party although has become something of a hate figure to some of her critics, with Labour describing her promotion as “alarming”.

During her previous three-year tenure as a minister of state at the Department for Work along with Pensions, she was a fiery defender of policy, often sent out by her equally combative boss, Iain Duncan Smith, to defend controversial benefit cuts, such as the so-called “bedroom tax”.

Image copyright

Image caption

Esther McVey was a junior minister under Iain Duncan Smith at the Department for Work along with Pensions

While she was often an effective media performer at a time of falling levels of unemployment, she appeared to struggle at times with details of the brief, including being reprimanded by the UK Statistics Authority for misquoting unemployment statistics.

Her defeat at the 2015 general election was a prized scalp for Labour, although she returned to Parliament last summer, winning the safe Tory seat of Tatton along with has quickly made the idea to cabinet.

Her critics say she often gave the impression of which she didn’t understand the lives of benefit claimants – along with her challenge may be to adapt her approach to get those Tory MPs who are squeamish about some of the government’s welfare policies to trust along with support her.


The government will be currently inside the middle of a climbdown over its overarching welfare adjustments.

An outcry inside the autumn over the way of which claimants were waiting typically six weeks without money, meaning some resorted to food banks or fell into rent arrears along with additional debts, convinced the chancellor in his November budget to spend £1.5bn in an effort to improve how the benefit will be delivered, adjustments of which are currently being rolled out.

although additional challenges remain. The underlying principle of universal credit (UC) will be of which work should always pay, of which people are always better-off taking a job or extra hours than staying on benefits.

However, in 2015, cuts were made in order of which people will currently lose more of each pound they earn than was originally intended, a marginal tax rate of 63%. For some, the current benefit system will be a greater incentive to work than UC. Many Conservatives – including Esther McVey’s former boss, Mr Duncan Smith – want to see those cuts reversed.

David Finch via the Resolution Foundation argues of which she needs to make UC more “female-friendly” by generating the idea more appealing to second earners in a household along with single parents.


There will be arguably no single group of benefit claimants who feel more aggrieved at continuing welfare adjustments than disabled people. At the heart of many of their complaints will be Pip, the benefit introduced by the Conservative-led coalition in 2013.

Image copyright
Science Photo Library

the idea’s designed to help with the additional costs of living having a disability or long-term health condition, which are measured using a controversial assessment of which claimants undergo to determine how much their condition affects what they can do.

An independent review of the benefit last year found of which there was no public trust inside the fairness along with consistency of those decisions.

An ever-growing number of decisions are being appealed against successfully, along with the review called for reforms of the benefits. Some campaigners want to scrap Pip entirely. of which’s probably not going to happen, although they say adjustments are needed.


For an increasing number of people, being in work will be no longer an insurance policy against being poor. According to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, more than half of the 13.5 million people living in poverty in 2016 were in working households, a figure of which’s increased by over 1 million since 2010-11.

Image copyright

A key driver has been of which private sector rents have risen faster than income, although little or no increases in benefit levels have also contributed. Millions of people in work rely on benefits, such as tax credits, housing benefit or increasingly universal credit, to help make ends meet.

How will a politician whose maxim could well be “work always pays” deal with the evidence of growing poverty in working households?


Critics say the main sickness benefit, the replacement for incapacity benefit, has so far failed to achieve the government’s goals. Devised by the Labour government in 2006, along with enthusiastically embraced by the coalition via 2010, campaigners say the idea will be in desperate need of radical change.

The fitness-for-work test of which claimants have to undergo has infuriated some benefit seekers, who see the system as being designed to catch them out, to prove they’re not ill.

via the government’s point of view, the predicted fall of 1 million fewer people claiming sickness benefits hasn’t happened, which consequently means the billions of pounds they thought they’d save hasn’t materialised either.

On top of of which, mistakes in moving people on to the fresh benefit are likely to raise its cost by another £500m. How will Ms McVey grasp of which nettle?

Regarding pensions Brian Milligan, the BBC’s personal finance correspondent, writes:

One of the achievements of the coalition government was to persuade people to save more for their retirement.

Workers signed up for the auto-enrolment pensions programme in droves, along with so far the opt-out rate has been low.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

The government plans to extend auto-enrolment to include all workers aged 18 along with over

although what has been accomplished so far has been the easy bit.

Until currently, contribution rates have been tiny: both staff along with employers contribute a minimum of 1% of salaries to pension pots.

although via of which April, workers will have to triple their contributions.

Esther McVey’s biggest challenge will be to persuade people to make those larger contributions, at a time when incomes are squeezed.

As far as the state pension will be concerned, one of the first questions she will face will be whether she plans to help the so-called Waspi women – or Women Against State Pension Inequality.

Image copyright
Getty Images

These are women born inside the 1950s, who had been expecting to get a state pension at the age of 60. Some of them claim they didn’t know about plans to delay their pensions until the age of 66.

Reality Check: The fight over women’s state pensions

along with then there’s the question of funding the state pension. A report by the Government Actuarial Department said national insurance contributions will eventually have to rise by 5% – or £1,000 per worker.

although of which’s one she can put on the back burner for currently.

Source link

Leave a Reply