US President Donald Trump’s reported reference to Haiti in addition to African nations as “shitholes” has sparked global outrage. nevertheless was of which racist?
Charlton McIlwain, professor in addition to dean at NYU, in addition to Drew Liquerman of Republicans Overseas, offer contradicting opinions on the matter.
Yes, of which was racist
Mr McIlwain: Yesterday, Donald Trump said African in addition to Haitian immigrants hail via “shithole countries”. A little black girl in addition to child of Haitian immigrants I know overheard. Unprompted, in addition to defiant she responded to her mother: “Donald Trump can be a shithole!” The word itself was foreign to her, nevertheless she intuitively understood the words were derogatory, demeaning – racist. In Trump’s words she recognised a constellation of associations in addition to inferences of which Trump drew on to make This kind of so.
A statement can be racist when of which explicitly denigrates in addition to/or asserts as true a negative, longstanding stereotype about an entire group of people, signalled by the colour of their skin. “Shithole” fits the bill inside vilest way. Those who manage using a straight face to say Trump’s words were not racist no doubt will point out of which he did not specify of which black people via these countries are shitholes. nevertheless, he did not have to.
We have longstanding in addition to differential associations between the colours white in addition to black. For much of our recent history, white has always represented all of which can be pure, clean, desirable. These associations are found inside language of our dictionaries, the one-time definition of Africa as the “dark continent”, in addition to the way we demarcated slaves via non-slaves throughout the slave trade. These associations define our beauty standards, animated through film in addition to television’s past in addition to present. in addition to, these colour associations still dominate our perceptions of leadership, images of success in addition to attributions of worth in addition to value.
Because of these longstanding in addition to pervasive associations between black in addition to white, Trump need only connect a few dots to express his racism. Denigrate immigrants via countries like Africa in addition to Haiti as shitholes with no value, then specify their opposite – people via “Norway“. Even a little girl can see what the primary difference can be between the two.
No, of which wasn’t
Mr Liquerman: While elite Washington media in addition to political class can be outraged over President Trump’s reported remarks on immigration, of which’s unclear what he actually said (the White House has disputed Senator Durbin’s account). President Trump’s alleged harsh characterisation of Haiti can be certainly uncouth, nevertheless nothing suggests of which’s racist. Haiti can be indisputably the poorest country inside Western Hemisphere in addition to has serious disease in addition to development problems, according to the WHO in addition to UN. Those same organisations (in addition to American leftists) consistently cite Norway as a prosperous, successful country.
With of which established, of which’s perfectly rational for any country – including the US – to prefer educated in addition to high-skilled immigrants, in addition to, unsurprisingly, those immigrants disproportionately come via wealthy, developed countries.
If President Trump had suggested we turn away all Haitians – even the educated, high-skilled ones who could help our country in addition to economy, as many immigrants via Haiti do – of which could be a different story. nevertheless he has made clear of which he wants help the economy by bringing inside best immigrants, wherever they may come via. Country of origin should neither make nor break anyone’s immigration application, as there are high-skilled in addition to talented citizens in every country who could contribute a lot to the US. nevertheless of which’s foolish to believe they are as prevalent in Haiti, where the literacy rate can be around 60%, as they are in Norway, where the literacy rate can be nearly 100%.
Ultimately, This kind of episode can be a case study in Democrats’ bad faith. Thankfully, informed Americans are too smart to fall into This kind of trap, the coming reforms to US immigration policy will reflect the views of the Trump administration, the GOP, in addition to the American people, not Washington insiders.