Senate Immigration Debate Gets Off to a Slow, Unhappy Start

yet from the Capitol, Mr. McConnell in addition to also his Democratic counterpart, Senator Chuck Schumer of fresh York, were unable to come to terms on an agreement of which would likely get the debate underway in earnest.

Mr. McConnell sought to open having a vote on legislation to punish so-called sanctuary cities, which refuse to cooperate with federal immigration officials. yet Mr. Schumer objected, on the grounds of which such a measure can be unrelated to DACA. Without the Democratic leader’s consent, debate cannot begin until midnight Tuesday, or very early Wednesday morning. Republicans were left fuming in frustration.

“This kind of can be the debate they said they wanted,” Mr. McConnell, sounding irked, told reporters Tuesday. “I said we’d have an open in addition to also fair process. We’re trying to do of which, in addition to also the sooner we get started out, the better because we need to wrap up This kind of week.”


Senator Chuck Schumer, the Democratic leader coming from fresh York, objected to beginning having a vote on legislation to punish so-called sanctuary cities.

Lawrence Jackson for The fresh York Times

Whether senators can stick to of which schedule remains an open question. The chamber can be scheduled to be in recess next week, yet some lawmakers are urging of which the immigration debate be continued after the recess if no resolution can be reached by Friday.

“The preference obviously can be to finish,” said Senator Jeff Flake, Republican of Arizona. “You never want to have a break right from the middle of a debate. of which’s not optimal. yet the item’s better than letting the item die.”

Immigration can be one of the most difficult in addition to also contentious issues to come before Congress. The last time the Senate debated immigration, in 2013, the matter was on the floor for weeks. the item culminated in Senate passage of a comprehensive immigration overhaul with 68 votes, yet the measure never got a vote from the House.

This kind of time, Mr. Trump has insisted of which any bill address what the White House can be calling “four pillars”: protecting the DACA recipients; beefing up border security, including funding for the president’s proposed border wall; ending or severely limiting family-based migration; in addition to also doing away with the diversity visa lottery, which can be aimed at encouraging immigration coming from underrepresented nations.

Mr. McConnell has embraced a Republican plan of which would likely meet the president’s conditions. yet the proposal, drafted by a group of Republicans led by Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, does not appear to have garnered the backing of 60 senators.

some other proposals are also floating around the Capitol, including a “skinny bill” or “two-pillar bill” of which would likely pair an extension of the DACA program with money for border security. Some Democrats say of which can be the path most likely to produce a measure of which 60 senators can support.

“I’m very optimistic,” said Senator Bill Nelson, Democrat of Florida in addition to also a member of the bipartisan group, called the Common Sense Coalition, of which has been negotiating behind the scenes. “I think at the end of the day, what the item’s going to be can be a simple solution. You’re going to take care of the DACA kids in addition to also their parents in exchange for doing the wall.”

yet Mr. Trump has said he would likely not sign such a bill, in addition to also some senators say they consider the “skinny” approach a waste of time.

“They think of which the best we can do can be a baby step,” Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, said, referring to those who are advocating a narrower bill. “in addition to also I don’t agree with of which. I want to solve This kind of problem. I think This kind of can be a case where moderation can be for monks. Let’s go solve the problem.”

Continue reading the main story

Source link

Leave a Reply